|
Charles2337 on November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am
I dont like the rear. Looks too boxy.
tipoomaster on November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am
nothing, my bad, i was just watching something on GM before i posted. i meant chrysler.
Tanner874 on November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am
What does GM have to do with rating Chrysler/Dodge engines?
caliberguy07 on November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am
only reason i still have a caliber is the 32mpg
austinman1995 on November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am
ya i know imagine if it was a front wheel drive?
austinman1995 on November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am
10 seconds to go to 60...... holy shit thats horrible.. my vw passat with a 1.8 L can reach 60 mp/h in 4.8 seconds isn't that sad that a smaller engine than the calber can get a car twice the caliber's weight going that quick?
mercman8888 on November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am
I think its a good crossover!
chitpaul on November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am
cheap plastic basic dash....almost bought 1......liked outside but the inside is cheap...got a 140bhp tdi vw golf instead....butch better....you can get the same engine in this aswell i know.. in the uk.
americancarguy on November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am
The caliber they tested was also AWD.
tipoomaster on November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am
further proof that horsepower ratings mean nothing. GM must have screwed up the timings or something. |